There is one main issue that Frank Vatrano could run into by selling his number. The issue that can arise is whether he owns the rights to the number. In this case, there are three entities that could own the rights to the number and have legitimate arguments. Those entities would be the player, the team, or the league. The player has the case that he has ownership of the number because the number has become a part of his identity. Since individuals own their identity a case could be made that the player has the right to give a piece of his identity to others thus, an argument can be made that he can sell his number to another player. The team's claim would be that since they give the player the platform in order to gain notoriety, they have ownership of the number. There is also the fact that at the begging of the career there was no notoriety to the number therefore there was no value of the number to the player. The player could have had any number at that time he co...
statue to limitations: how long you have to sue someone: can be affected by circumstances law can change as society changes see the issue from both sides who are potential parties not all facts are relevant: what additional facts would I like to know contract claims or tort claims, clams can be criminal and civil make sure to put the liability and damage what defenses might there be against your case what is a sport: done for enjoyment or thrill, skill and involve a challenge for potential injury inherent risk: the risk posed by an error or omission a factor, other than a failure in internal control financial statement due to things that are outside the concept of the game you can be sued inherent risks also cover spectators i.e. getting hit by a foul ball at a baseball game Shannon v. rhodes established what must be done to be a sport must be done for enjoyment or thrill requires ...