- Professor Richard Walden 11pm-11:15 last 2 weeks 10:45
- Work is independent Homework is due @ 5pm the day before class email all work. put the work in the body of the email and put your name on every page: fact hypothetical 5pm the day before class email all work
- put the work in the body of email, put name on every page: fact hypothetical 5pm the day before
- meeting with the professor once a week in groups: Tests are open book
- 1 to 2 make up classes: 2-3 hour class, 5-6 per group
- 1 midterm and final, final is 50-100 True false and multiple choice and 1 essay
- each week homework and thought piece
- homework : check photos
- put name on thought pience in email , bullet point
- groups: 6 groups of 6 30 min zoom session talk about what we covered
- individual weekly presentation
- logistics of midterm: figuring out how its going to actually occur
- Do a hypothetical: subject- negligence
- fact set in questions
- send in a word or email
- send to him for feedback
- thought piece: 6th grader runs toward an opposing ball carrier they collided with each other and the head of the teammate hit the student in the mouth and knocked out two teeth. Family sues the school claiming negligent supervision. Who is likely to win and why? what element of a negligent claim is most important in the case? Would it matter if there had been history of animosity between the student and teammate
- midterm next week after class 3
- 50% true false 50% essay question: create an outline for essay can send it to him for feedback
- How to take notes on cases:IRAC: Issue, Rule, Analysis, Conclusion
- Midterm: on canvas on quizzes: 2 parts M/C, T/F then written
- published tomorrow Thursday- Saturday 4 hours
- exam published on thursday on canvas
- no homework
There is one main issue that Frank Vatrano could run into by selling his number. The issue that can arise is whether he owns the rights to the number. In this case, there are three entities that could own the rights to the number and have legitimate arguments. Those entities would be the player, the team, or the league. The player has the case that he has ownership of the number because the number has become a part of his identity. Since individuals own their identity a case could be made that the player has the right to give a piece of his identity to others thus, an argument can be made that he can sell his number to another player. The team's claim would be that since they give the player the platform in order to gain notoriety, they have ownership of the number. There is also the fact that at the begging of the career there was no notoriety to the number therefore there was no value of the number to the player. The player could have had any number at that time he co...
Comments
Post a Comment